Plantilla de artículo 2013
Andean Geology 42 (3): 329-348, September, 2015
Andean Geology
doi: 10.5027/andgeoV42n3-a03
Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the terminal fan of Candeleros Formation (Neuquén Group), Lower Cretaceous, Neuquén Basin, provinces of Neuquén and Mendoza, Argentina
María Lidia Sánchez1, Estefanía Asurmendi1, 2

1 Departamento de Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC), ruta nacional N° 36, Km 603, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.

2 Cátedra de Micropaleontología, División Paleozoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, La Plata, CP 1900, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

The Candeleros Formation is represented by a succession of deposits that represent terminal fans starting to fill a foreland basin (back-arc) during the Albian. The different sub-environments of the terminal fan suggest low gradients during the onset of deposition of the Río Limay Subgroup (Neuquén Group). The terminal fan system is represented by distributary zone (TF-DZ), distributary zone-base zone (TF-DZBZ) and base zone deposits (TF-BZ). Its most notable feature is the presence of bitumen in “pockets” and scattered in the sandstone channel fill and crevasse splays deposit. In this system the feeder zone of the terminal fan system has not been identified, however, the distribution of architectural elements and paleocurrent data allow us to infer that the catchment area of the backbone would have been located to the NNW/NW. Distributary zone deposits are characterized by thick deposits of low sinuosity channel, with a high degree of connectivity and strong vertical aggradation of channel belts. Deposits of distributary zone-base zone are characterized by a higher density of channel deposits/distributary plain, but with belt channel less thick, longer laterally, greater width/thickness ratio and connectivity in the braided deposits. The distal parts of the terminal fan are well represented and vary only in the channelized deposits and mantle/floodplain ratio, which is abruptly reduced towards the flood basin connection. The importance of Candeleros Formation deposits is that they are remnants of accommodation that preserved the original architecture and represent exhumed reservoirs.

Keywords: Candeleros Formation, Neuquén Basin, Terminal fan.



1. Introdution

The Neuquén Basin (Fig. 1) is a localized ensialic depression occuring in positions of an intra-arc (Chile) and retro-arc (Argentina). The tectonic history of the basin involves different stages, such as the development of rift basins during the Late Triassic-Jurassic (Legarreta and Gulisano, 1989; Ramos and Folguera, 2005). During the Cretaceous, as a result of the growth of the volcanic arc, the basin was completely isolated from the sea due to changes in the dynamics of the continental margin at the western edge of South America. Various factors, particularly changes in the expansion rate of the South Atlantic Ocean, the reorganization of the Pacific Plate and the decrease in the angle of subduction led to the development of compressive tectonics that caused the reversal of extensional and flexural basin structures in the Neuquén Basin region (Cobbold and Rossello, 2003). This back-arc foreland basin was controlled by compressive tectonics, tectonic inversion and the uplift of the area located to the west. The Agrio Fold -and- Thrust Belt (Fig. 1) foreland phase and position controlled the distribution of major depocenters, which include the Neuquén and Malargüe Groups, and their migration to the east (Howell et al., 2005; Ramos and Folguera, 2005). By the end of the Cretaceous, the Atlantic marine transgression, associated with high sea level on a global scale, affected the Neuquén Basin and allowed the deposition of shallow marine sediments over large areas (Cobbold and Rosello, 2003).




Fig. 1. A. Map of Neuquen Basin (modified from Cobbold and Rosello, 2003; Manacorda et al., 2004; Ramos and Folguera, 2005), with major structural features. To the west the volcanic arc and Fold - and - Thrust Belt NE verging to the Cretaceous; to the south, the Huincul arch. The study area is indicated by the red rectangle in the center of the figure and signalled by arabic numerals (1-3); B. Table of chronostratigraphic Neuquen Group (in pink stratigraphic unit studied); C. Geological map of the study area.



The Río Limay Subgroup (De Ferrariis, 1968) is the basal unit of the Neuquén Group (Fig. 1) consisting of fluvial, aeolian, lacustrine and deltaic deposits accumulated in the Neuquén Foreland Basin. This basin includes the Candeleros, Huincul and Cerro Lisandro Formations and has a minimum thickness of 350 m. It ranges from the Albian to early Turonian and crops out in the southwestern Mendoza Province, the eastern and southe astern Neuquén Province and the northwestern Río Negro Province (Hugo and Leanza, 2001).

Although there have been studies in certain localities, concerned with the depositional architecture and auto- and allocyclic mechanisms that controlled sedimentation (Sánchez et al., 2008), there is a notable absence of studies level developing an evolutionary model at basin level.

This paper aims to characterize and interpret, at different scales, the architecture of the terminal fan depositional system of the Candeleros Formation range by identifing and correlating discontinuities in the development of the stratigraphic sequence of the Río Limay Subgroup (local and regional). This will be a contribution to the tecto-sedimentary evolution of the subgroup in the central Neuquén Basin. For this purpose we selected continuous exposures of an up to 8 km long sector at the foot of the Agrio Fold - and - Thrust Belt in the region of Sierra de Reyes and the Cara Cura Belt. We present here the first map showing the formations that make up the Río Limay Subgroup, which have been identified and mapped for the first time in this region (Fig. 1c).

The importance of defining the depositional system and its relationship with autocyclic and allocyclic processes during their formation, is that they constitute depositional remnants of accommodation (Martinsen, 2003), which preserve the original architecture and represent exhumed reservoirs (Sánchez and Asurmendi, 2011; Asurmendi and Sánchez, 2014a; Asurmendi and Sánchez, 2014b).

2. Tectonic framework

The Neuquén Group corresponds to the synorogenic deposits of the Andean Foreland Basin (Cretaceous-Tertiary), and since the Cenomanian it has been affected by a complex history of deformation that peaked during the late Campanian (Silvestro and Zubiri, 2008). The start of the red sediments of the Neuquén Group begins with the deposition of the Candeleros (Keidel in Wichmann, 1927) Formation after the Diastrophic Phase of Patagonides Movements, which is expressed in the intercretaceous or intercenomanian unconformity (Ramos, 1981; Leanza, 2009; Tunik et al., 2010) aged 97±3 Ma. The Candeleros Formation has its type locality east of the hill Lotena in the southern Province of Neuquén and its maximum thickness is approximately 300 m. The sequence in the type locality is interpreted as deposits of braided river systems associated with muddy floodplain deposits with development of paleosols (Herrero Ducloux, 1946; Leanza and Hugo, 1997; Garrido, 2000; Rodríguez et al., 2007). While near the damming of El Chocón, Spalletti and Gazzera (1994) mencionated an environment corresponding to eolian and beach-lake deposits.

There is general consensus that the depositional basin systems were strongly controlled by the beginning of compressive tectonics during the Late Jurassic (Vergani et al., 1995; Pángaro and Bruveris, 1999; Silvestro and Zubiri, 2008). The foreland basin stage (120-75 Ma - Vergani et al.,  1995; Howell et al.,  2005) is associated with the inversion of the compressional regime of the Andean margin, which controlled the size, shape and eastward migration of depocenters, thus resulting in the deposition of the Neuquén and Malargüe Groups (Cobbold and Rosello, 2003, Howell et al., 2005; Aguirre Urreta et al., 2011). Orogenic events in western Gondwana coincided with the start of the opening of the Atlantic Ocean and the absolute motion of the South American Plate to the west. The main stress vector, oriented NNW to NW during the Jurassic, rotated to a more orthogonal orientation during the late (Ramos and Folguera, 2005).

Early Cretaceous, which controlled the development of the Agrio Fold -and- Thrust Belt, forming the Late Cretaceous orogenic front. The shortening and lifting of the Agrio Fold -and- Thrust Belt (Fig. 1a) started at about 100 Ma with the inversion of the structurs of previously developed semi-grabens and continued its late Miocene migration of deformation toward the foreland (Zapata and Folguera, 2005; Zamora Valcarce et al., 2007).

The Huincul Arch (Fig. 1a) is a first-order morphostructural feature in the Neuquén Basin with a general east-west orientation and extention of more then 270 km, constituting a structural barrier that exerted a strong control on sedimentation during the Jurassic and Cretaceous in the southern part of the Neuquén Basin. The geometric complexity and evolution of structures on a regional scale is explained by the oblique convergence between two regions of different mechanical behaviors (Silvestro and Zubiri, 2008; Pángaro et al.,  2009; Naipauer et al.,  2012).

Evidence for the beginning of compression in the andean basin was preserved in the Huincul Arch and along EW, NE and NE lineaments in the Albian, when the arch was very active, and persisted until the Tertiary. In the central sector of the basin, major anticlinal structures and lineaments are related to the trend of the most important inversion of semi-graben depocenters of previous extensional tectonics, inverting only in sections of extensional faults. These strain systems are of major importance in the structural features identified in the deposits of the Neuquén Group (Silvestro and Zubiri, 2008).

The compressive regime also affected the Chihuidos anticlinal structure with an area extending 70 km (Fig. 1a), elongated in the north-south direction. Subsurface information shows that this structure is of a low structural complexity, and its source would be linked to the oblique subduction of the tectonic compression between the Early Jurassic and Valanginian (Mosquera and Ramos, 2005). The deformational events associated with this structure, which played an important role in the tectonic basin, occurred from the Jurassic to late Miocene (Zamora Valcarce et al., 2009). The hinterlad of the Chihuidos structure has already been considered by some authors (Cobbold and Rosello, 2003) as a topographic high that could have actued as a peripheral bulge from the Aptian, conditioning the distribution of the different depocenters during the evolution of the foreland basin. The Neuquén Group includes three full overfilled-underfilled cycles of a foreland basin (Sánchez and Asurmendi, 2011), limited by discontinuities that are associated with the activity of the orogenic front and the subsequent stages of flexural subsidence. The discontinuities that limit Albian-Cenomanian sequences correspond to the Peruvian phase and the beginning of compressive tectonics in the Turonian and Santonian (Cobbold and Rosello, 2003; Rodríguez et al., 2007; Tunik et al., 2010).

During the late Campanian, the orogenic front migrated eastward, reaching the area of the Neuquén River (Aguirre Urreta et al., 2011). The expansion and migration of the volcanic arc took place toward the foreland (Ramos and Folguera, 2005). The compressional stage and subsequent flexural loading controlled the general tilting to the east of the basin and the first Atlantic transgression. The latter was widely distributed in the central part of Neuquén Province and north of the Río Negro, and the age and paleogeography is represented by rocks of the Campanian-Maastrichtian of the Río Colorado Subgroup and Maastrichtian-Danian of the Malargüe Group (Uliana and Dellapé, 1981; Barrios, 1990; Sánchez et al., 2006; Armas y Sánchez, 2008; Sánchez and Armas, 2008; Sánchez et al., 2008; Sánchez et al., 2009; Aguirre Urreta et al., 2011).

3. Methodology

The outcrops in this study (Fig. 1) represent both types of a terminal fan basin margin, and were selected based on the quality and continuity of exposure, abundance of sandstone, accessibility, and their potential for expanded, detailed studies. The methods used for the collection and analysis of data from the Candeleros Formation in the west-central Neuquén Basin follow a stratigraphic and sedimentological approach: a survey of 3 sections over 15 km with identification of the different integrating sedimentary units (Figs. 1a and c). Facies analysis and mapping was completed on photomosaic outcrop maps. This technique was used to define lithosomes and their bounding surfaces. We identified the lithology, sedimentary structures (Table 1), geometry of the deposits and paleocurrent data, which were then analyzed statistically. Also, extensive outcrops were photographed in order to identify and document any architectural elements (Table 2) present in accordance with the methodology proposed by Miall (1985). In addition, we carried out an integrated profile development at a scale of approximately 1:20 (Fig. 2) in order to provide detailed documentation of the facies profiles. Their identification and interpretation, together with the analysis of associations and architectural elements at meso-macro scale allowed the identification of processes involved in the development of the terminal fan units.

4. Architectural elements of terminal fan

4.1. Distributary zone deposits

Distributary zone deposit (TF-DZ) consists of fine massive conglomerates (Gm), as well as cross-stratified and planar cross-stratified conglomerates (Gt, Gp, respectively), followed either by horizontally bedded medium-grained sandstones or trough cross-stratified sandstone (St), then by planar cross-stratified sandstone, and in a subordinate manner, by massive sandstone (Sm). The facies associations are laterally extensive, interconnected bodies of up to 250 m (Fig. 2), with erosive basal surfaces. Individually, the association shows considerable variation in arrangements and spatial relationships. The association comprises a compound amalgamated channel (Table 2), with lateral assemblages of more than 8 m thick, associated laterally with multistorey bodies 0.20 and 0.30 cm thick, respectively. These bodies are associated with deposits composed of Fl and Sr (Table 1). These often include abundant volcaniclastic material (Tlpm and Tlpe). It is common to find ferrous carbonate nodules of pedogenic origin, both in sand deposits and in those of very fine particle sizes, the latter associated with mudcracks.

Interpretation: These deposits are interpreted as channel belts of low sinuosity, showing the migration of 3D dunes and overlapping of vertical and lateral large dunes, simple, transverse or oblique complex bars, preserving the original morphology (Figs. 3 and 4). The channels often suffered avulsion and reinstallation processes or they are deeply incised into the floodplain (Table 2). The presence of small bars formed by lateral accretion suggests commonly coalesced downstream bars, a common process in braided systems (Jo and Chough, 2001). Since the bars have not suffered significant erosion processes and developed a complex pattern in the filling of individual belts, it is possible to estimate that they have been subjected to a high aggradation rate. Pedogenic bioturbation by the action of organisms or roots suggests a simultaneous hiatus of clastic deposition in surrounding floodplain areas and channel fills.

The distribution pattern of channel belts/floodplains is interpreted as a distributary system with mobile channels that migrated laterally, eroding their floodplains and periodically inhibiting the development of mature paleosols. The layout of the paleochannels allows to infer that many channels coexisted in the floodplain in the system. Channel belts have a high variability in their type of fill, suggesting in some cases that they originated from flows of high energy and low frequency (Parkash et al., 1983; Paola et al., 1989; Bridge and Best, 1997; Marshall, 2000; Alexander et al., 2001; Fielding, 2006).

These characteristics suggest a distributary zone for the sediments of the terminal fan (MacCarthy, 1990; Sadler and Kelly, 1993; Kelly and Olsen, 1993; Nichols and Fisher, 2007).




Fig. 2. Stratigraphic and sedimentological section for Candeleros Formation in the study area.





Fig. 3. Facies map of the terminal fan of the Candeleros Formation in the study area. The Huincul and Lisandro Formations also crop out.





Fig. 4. A-B. Distributary channel deposits corresponding to distributary zone (TF-DZ) reflecting braidplain characteristics. Note stacking channels; C. Enlargement of the figure a; the yellow arrows indicate the lateral channel accretion; D. Detail of normal aggradation and lateral accretion channels.



4.2. Distributary zone-basinal zone deposits

Distributary zone-basinal zone deposits (TF-DZBZ) consist of fine-grained conglomerates (Se), massive conglomerates (Gm) and horizontally bedded medium-grained sandstones (Sh) or trough cross-stratified sandstone (St), planar cross-stratified sandstone (Sp) and massive sandstone (Sm). The association integrates large bodies of some hundreds of meters, interconnected along erosive bases. These bodies fill compound bodies with stacked channel geometry more than 5 m thick. The multistorey bodies are laterally associated with mantle or lobe type units, ranging between 0.20 cm and 0.50 cm thick. The sand bodies are associated with units comprising lithofacies Fl, Pl, Sr and volcaniclastic material (Tlpm and Tlpe-Table 1). The activity of organisms, roots and rhizoconcretions, ferruginous halos and developing pedogenic nodules is common in sand bodies or finer deposits.

Interpretation: This architectural element with a low ratio of suspended bedload indicates sedimentation within aggradational channel (Figs. 3 and 5). The tabular geometry and erosive bases indicate the existence of a network of low sinuosity channels with high textural variation, reactivation surfaces, bedload sediments and multiple scours. The lateral extent of the bodies, uniform paleocurrent direction and low width/thickness ratio are consistent with the deposits of braided rivers (Miall, 1977; Tunbridge, 1981; Rust and Jones, 1987; Gibling, 2006).Variations in grain size and sedimentary structures within sets are typical of migrating sand bars in rivers with a low to moderate sinuosity.




Fig. 5. Distributary zone-basinal zone deposits (TF-DZBZ). A. Low sinuosity channels that migrate in a large floodplain; B. Arrows indicate accretion and migration of transverse bars and linguoides.



It is interpreted that this element corresponds to low sinuosity channels that migrated within a large floodplain (Mjøs et al., 1993; Jorgensen and Fielding, 1996; Bristow et al., 1999; Jo, 2003).

The individual fluvial channels accreted obliquely by a combination of lateral migration and aggradation, generating a complex fill pattern, in which large-scale 3D dunes and oblique and lateral bars are stacked and overlapped laterally. Channel belts show numerous crevasse-splays at small to medium scale (Khan et al., 1997; McCarthy et al., 1997; Zaleha, 1997). Some tabular channels connect with other channel belts and show that they co-existed on the plain. The deformation of the avalanche faces of intrachannel macroforms suggests rapid deposition and exceptional discharge events. The aggradational character of the system can be inferred from the frequent preservation of sand wave tops and the form of the different bar units.

The channels, in some cases, pass gradually over levee deposits and transitionaling to the floodplain. Channel belts exhibit traces, root traces, evidence of infaunal activity and redox effects produced by oxidation and reduction, which suggest breaks in operating systems. The evidence also suggests the development of truncated paleosols or compounds in the floodplain, allowing to infer long periods of inactivity suddenly altered by extraordinary flood events.

The distribution of geomorphic features reflect paleogeographic zonation in the development of interconnected channels that suffered frequent avulsion processes, acting in some cases simultaneously in different sections of a terminal fan. A floodplain with condensed sections (Pl) reflects periods of low supply. The abundance of tree fragments in the overflow elements suggests that an arboreal vegetation associated with the channel edge was eroded during events of high water discharge, and that there were sediments in suspension in the floodplain that were rapidly deposited during the decline in flow energy (Devaney, 1999). Larger trunks trapped in the channels deformed underlying sediment structures and their orientation is oblique to main paleocurrent direction. This allows to infer deposition from suspension during the final stages of a major flood event.

The alternation of flood events with long periods of inactivity of the river belt is registered in the pedogenic development in channel deposits: plant traces, rhizoconcretions, roots activity at the top of the macroforms, and the presence of pedogenic calcretes, which attest to the development of an edaphic floodplain deeply incised during the channel floods (Davies et al., 1993; Müller et al., 2004). The close relationship between the channel deposits and aeolian dunes (are not described in this manuscript) developed in the floodplain also allow to infer long periods of low channel supply.

These general characteristics allow us to infer palaeoclimate seasonality with a system of concentrated rainfall, while the paleogeography suggests the presence of elements common in sections of distal distributary fan systems (Sadler and Kelly, 1993; Marshall, 2000; Hornung and Aigner, 2002; Nichols and Fisher, 2007).

4.3. Basinal Zone

Basinal zone deposits (TF-BZ) consist of massive sandstone (Sm), planar cross-stratified sandstone at small scale (Sp), ripple cross-lamination sandstone (Sr), heterolithic successions, and siltstone and claystone with horizontal lamination (Fm, Fl). The sandy lithofacies composed of tabular or lobed multistorey units, with planar or erosive bases, lateral extensions between 10 and 100 m and thicknesses up to 30 cm. They were observed to be isolated or interconnected, sometimes tabular bodies of great thicknesses and lateral continuity. The sand multistorey bodies are associated with the FlF, SrF, PlF, Tlpm and Tlpe lithofacies. Also common are caliche covering the sandy units or interbedded between the very fine-grained lithofacies.

Interpretation: These lenticular sandstone units with erosive bases comprise multiple units of the order of a few centimeters (Figs. 3 and 6) and lithofacies deposited under a high flow rate followed by low regime successions indicating an abrupt decay in the energy of the flows. These are interpreted as distributary channels with little lateral accretion filled during flood events. Such deposits have been described as discrete units of low sinuosity channels in the of distributary plain environment (Parkash et al., 1983).




Fig. 6. Basinal zone deposits. A-B. deposits of sheetflood sandstones; C. ephemeral stream channel sandstones.



The presence of small trunk fragments and root traces included in lobate bodies suggests that they are the result of flow disturbance due to the vegetation, which contributed to the deposition of sediments in the terminal portions of distributaries with lobed morphologies. A prominent feature of the distal zones is that much more sandstone is present as thin sheetfloods deposits than as channel-fill facies. These sheetsfloods have a sharp, sometimes erosive base, and this scouring at the base of sheetsfloods suggests local flow channelization (Marshall, 2000; Nichols and Fisher, 2007). Desiccation cracks and bioturbation at the top of the deposits are indicative of extensive periods of inactivity during which vertic paleosoils and caliche horizons developed (Sadler and Kelly, 1993). Changes in gradients after flood events caused the migration of depositional sites and alternated the distribution of section lobe, sheets and distributary channels. Floodplain deposits include horizons of compound and complex paleosols (Kraus and Wells, 1999) and an important contribution of reworked volcanic products. Paleosol horizons were associated with areas of low sedimentation rate and climatic seasonality periods controlling high accumulation ranges and frequent flooding episodes. The association of lithofacies and their distribution allows the assigning of these deposits to a distal floodplain-basin in a terminal fan (Parkash et al.,  1983; Kelly and Olsen, 1993; Sadler and Kelly, 1993; Newell et al., 1999; Hampton and Horton, 2007; Hornung and Aigner, 2002; Wakelin-King and Webb, 2007; Wolela, 2009).

5. Stratigraphic architecture of the terminal fan system

This system is represented by the distributary zone (TF-DZ), distributary zone-basinal zone (TF-DZBZ), and basinal zone (TF-BZ). This terminal fan system (Figs. 3 and 7) is the environment of greatest areal extent and development within the Candeleros Formation. Its most outstanding feature is the presence of bitumen in the form of pockets and dispersed in the sandstone of channel-fill and crevasse splay deposits.

Interpretation: In this system the proximal channel of the terminal fan has not been identified. However, the distribution of architectural elements and paleocurrent data allow us to infer that the catchment area of the hinterland was located to the NNW/NW (Fig. 2).

Deposits of the distributary zone are characterized by thick deposits of low sinuosity channels, with some deposits of sinuous channels, with a high degree of connectivity and strong vertical aggrada-tion (Rajchl and Ulicny, 2005) of channel belts (Fig. 2). They remained fixed within the floodplain for long periods and generated pronounced stacking and vertical aggradation. Crevasse splays deposits are extensive, dominating the floodplain and connecting the main channel belts that co-existed. The avulsion process had an aggradational style that included reinstalling the channel belt on their previous deposits overflow and other active belts. This is consistent with a floodplain that was dominated by processes related to crevasse splays and suffered a high frequency of flooding (Jones and Hajek, 2007). The abundant carbonate concretions and rhizoconcretions present in the channel deposits originated from paleosols in sandy sediments rich in calcium and carbonate subjected to repeated cycles of wetting and drying (Esteban and Kappla, 1983; Retallack, 1990). High discharge events are also documented by the incorporation of large-scale tree trunks in the channel fills. The presence of trunks also suggests highly vegetated areas associated with the channel belts. Burrows, bioturbation and traces of scattered bushes provide evidence of intermittent exposure of the top of channel bars and rapid colonization. Halos were observed in the crevasse deposits, which indicate variations in redox conditions, suggesting a short-lived state of saturation after the event that gave rise to the state of saturation. Redox conditions are a common feature in the presence of strong climatic seasonality, where periods of heavy rainfall are followed by periods of drought and induce fluctuation of the water table, which generates changes in reducing to oxidizing conditions resulting in the formation of mottles (Daniels et al., 1971). The interdistributary floodplain (TF-DZBZ) had a small proportion of clays and paleosols exhibiting no profuse root penetration. This is associated with poor exposure of floodplain sediments and permanence of the water table at the base of the paleosols. This is confirmed by the development of paleosols less than 1 m thick and the existence of a channel sandy substrate that may have acted as an aquifer (Therrien, 2005). The distal distributary plain is characterized by a higher density of channel deposits, but with less thick and laterally longer channel belts (slightly more than a hundred meters), greater width/thickness ratios and a greater connectivity ratio than in braided distributary channels. Channel belts are generally characterised by low sinuosity, although some are interspersed with some belts of high sinuosity with a good development of lateral accretion units. One common feature with in the upper reaches of the terminal fan is the development of crevasse splays sequences extending laterally to reach other channel areas. These channel belts developed a typical pattern of oblique aggradation (Fig. 7; Rajchl and Uličný, 2005; Jones and Hajek, 2007). While avulsion triggers include tectonic factors and the paleoclimate mentioned above, locally they may have influenced by the low gradients that caused a great expansion of flood flows, generating differential gradients that controlled the new sites of channel belts. In addition to these extrabasinal factors, vegetation may have caused the blockage of flows. The evidence of this process are overflow horizons with preservation of abundant trunks fragments. Local avulsions were the product of migration of the upstream avulsion focus and included resettlement and lateral migration on crevasse deposits such as those observed in this sector of the distributary plain. The importance of these channel belts is the presence of abundant bitumen that induced a deep purple coloration of outcrops, abundantly present in crevasse deposits. The interdistributary plain is dominated by crevasse deposits. The presence of paleosols is a minor feature, as there is no noticeable development of paleosols. The absence of deep root traces combined with the activity of perforating organisms indicate that the water table was deep. An important element associated with this section of the terminal fan is the development of a dune field (Sánchez and Asurmendi, 2011) with barchanoid or transverse forms (not described in this paper), whose migration was strongly controlled by fluctuations in the water level and interference caused by channel avulsion. Its expression in the outcrops is locally reduced, however, it is likely that the dunes were widely distributed as discrete units throughout the development area of the terminal fan.




Fig. 7. A. Terminal fan model of Candeleros Formation; B. The lateral design between channels and overflow deposits. The system design will result in a gradational stratigraphic style avulsion.



The distal parts of the terminal zone are well represented and vary only in the ratio between channelled deposits and mantle/floodplain deposits, which abruptly decreases toward the flood basin. This sub-enviroment presents local paleosol development incorporating a leached clay horizon (Bt), and in general, indicate that the rate of sediment accumulation during certain periods was lower and that the sub-enviroment was more stable (Therrien, 2005), without discarding the fact that paleosols on relative topographic highs are less susceptible to flooding, except in exceptional shock, since the development of a single paleosol is not generally recognized, but represents the compound type (Kraus, 1999). This style suggests pauses in sedimentation and prolonged stability in the floodplain that were succeeded by renewed pedogenesis phases (Davies et al., 1993; Müller et al., 2004).

The abundance of slickensides, rhizoconcretions and carbonate nodules along with ferruginous intergrowths shows the irregularity of the paleoprecipitation with, repeated wetting-drying cycles associated with alternation between wet and dry periods (Esteban and Kappla, 1983; Retallack, 1990).

The presence of more mature paleosols with well-developed calcrete horizons in certain areas of the floodplain indicates that the rate of sediment accumulation during certain periods was lower and indicates that the sub-enviroment was more stable (Therrien, 2005). The development of slickensides in paleosols confirms the sub-arid/sub-humid conditions in which paleoprecipitation may have exceeded a threshold of 760 mm/year (Horrell, 1991; Bush, 1997; Voigt et al., 1999; Retallack, 1994; 2001).

Signs of erosion in the flood basin are not considered as depositional surfaces because flood sediments are deposited only during periods of high discharge. It is expected that less significant and higher frequency flood flows including those in which channels run from bank to bank, impose their own record on the channel (Stam, 2002). The cycles of recurrent flooding in this area of the basin generated a thick sequence with typical deposits produced by ephemeral streams in sheet flood events and the absence of clay-size components in the flood environments. These two characteristics are typical of current systems rich in sand where flooding covers hundreds of meters, with the development of low-amplitude dunes, about a few tens of cms in height, with large areas covered by fine sandstones or siltstones in flood deposits (Tanner and Spencer, 2007).

6. Discussion

Outcrop data presented here allow us to define a distributary and basinal zone which toward the top exhibits floodplain deposits constituting a continuous succession. Identifying terminal fan subenvironments (Figs. 3, 7 and 8) allows us to infer low regional topographic gradients during the onset of the deposition of the Río Limay Subgroup (Neuquén Group).

The Candeleros Formation is a succession of terminal megafan deposits (Fig. 9) representing the start of the filling of the foreland basin during the Albian (Ramos, 1999; Cobbold and Rossello, 2003; Sánchez et al., 2004; Manacorda et al., 2004; Howell et al., 2005; Zapata and Folguera, 2005; Ramos and Folguera, 2005; Veiga et al., 2005; Ramos et al., 2008).

The terminal fan system at the base of the profile (Fig. 2) is represented by a flood basin environment that reflects a period of expansion of the system when the basinal zone was reworked by sheet floods. They were fed by three different mechanisms, shallow channels that lost their transport capacity under the influence of extremely low gradients, flow expansion phenomena related to topographic lows where the water eventually emerges and a spilling flow occurs (Tooth, 1999; Lang et al., 2004) and small distributary channels during episodes of high discharge from headwater systems that allowed for the extension of flows in the flood basin. Channelized episodes covered limited distances in the floodplain because of the rapid loss of speed by friction that increased at the base of the channel, with increasing radial distance from the origin and laterally from the axis of the stream (Cuevas Gozalo and Martinius, 1993). The resulting large-scale architecture was formed by scatterd, and small channels and sheets and very fine sandstone/siltstones. The pedogenetic phases they might register only poorly developed paleosols, suggesting few periods of stability in the basin. The erosional surfaces within the plain are not considered to reflect significant discontinuities, as the dynamics of the system were controlled by the frequency of periods of high water discharge and sediments related to climatic conditions. In terms of paleoclimatic conditions, the paleosols of the terminal fan system reflect sub-humid/sub-arid conditions with paleoprecipitation that may have exceeded a threshold of 760 mm/year (Horrell, 1991; Bush, 1997; Voigt et al., 1999; Retallack, 1994). This part of the Candeleros Formation represents a period of strong aggradation (Figs. 2 and 8), which is associated with high accommodation generated by a pulse of subsidence related to the activity of the Agrio Fold -and- Thrust belt, concomitant with the activity of the volcanic arc located to the west, which supplied ashfall deposits to the basinal zone. A slow progradation of the system started, resulting in the progressive installation of more proximal facies. The distal distributary fan system was characterized by braided stream flows with a high rate of aggradation, which caused frequent changes in the gradient of the channel floor, resulting in aggradation in the interdistributary floodplain by overflow deposits. The erodibility of plain deposits, given the low participation of clays and low topographic relief favored the development of avulsion by stratigraphically gradual annexation (Jones and Hajek, 2007). The system was characterized by a lateral aggradation style with a high connectivity between channels (Fig. 7). Channel belts have few incision features, many of which preserve bed form tops. However, channel belts alternate with high sinuosity channels that have an excellent preservation of their architecture.




Fig. 8. A. Avulsion model system for distributary terminal fan of Candeleros Formation, a nodal point that is present in each of the distributary is recognized. Local avulsions are limited by the margins of the floodplain and reinstall of the active channel on the crevasse deposits (from Rajchl and Uličný, 2005); B. Models of regional avulsion for the terminal fan of Candeleros Formation from the distal zone, distal to distributary zone and distributary zone (Fig. 3). Note the changes in the ratio of connectivity, style aggrading channel belts, oblique aggradation in the central part of the image (middle seccion of the Candeleros Formation), and single aggradation at the top (top of the Candeleros Formation).






Fig. 9. A. Accommodation curve for each of the sections of the Candeleros Formation; B. Model of terminal fan adapted from Kelly and Olsen (1993) and Hampton and Horton (2007). Transects identified in the plan view with a straight and vertical panels; C. Satellite image of the workspace. The arrows indicate the correspondence with each of the schemes.



The seasonal concentration of rainfall regulated periods of flooding and unusual sedimentation events. During the latter the vegetated interdistributary plain together with the high erodibility of the channel edges allowed flow dispersion over large areas and during the flood peak tree trunks were incorporated as fragments.

Large sections of the plain were occupied by aeolian dunes. However, they had limited migration controlled by the crevasse splays of the main channels, and were eroded during periods of channel avulsion.

Aggradation mechanisms suggest a large accommodation space. Subsidence is considered as the determining factor in the low channel/flood plain ratio. The domain of a high accommodation space and well-developed aggradation systems implies a period with a high subsidence rate (Martinsen et al., 1999; Rygel and Gibling, 2006; López-Gómez et al., 2010). The high contribution of sediments and frequency of floods in the basin produced channel incision and allowed the onset of progradation of the system.

The macroarchitecture shows a change during the development of the proximal braidplain. Initially a decrease is observed in the width/thickness ratio of channel units, having been mostly of low sinuosity. Although the style of avulsion remained the general trend was the reoccupation of existing channels and stacking, including the deeper incision of belts. This part of the Candeleros Formation is interpreted as a stage of progressive decrease in accommodation space accompanied by a slow progradation of the system. A more significant change in terms of stratigraphic architecture took place at the top of the unit. An abrupt change in grain-size, thickening of the sandstone bodies and the stacking design of channels indicate the sudden installation of distributary zone deposits. This suggests the development of a new terminal fan and a strong incision of proximal deposits related to the rapid migration of the feeder system. It follows that during this period changes in capture registered an event of lower reduction in accommodation space related to the autodynamics of the terminal fan. The marked aggradation pulses exceeded the threshold of creation of accommodation space, and the changing topography forced the rearrangement of the system.

The Candeleros Formation ends with deposits of a distributary zone containing three terminal fan sequences (Fig. 8), with continued participation of volcanoclastics components that suggest an intermittent activity of the arc.

7. Conclusions

  • The Candeleros Formation at the foot of the fold and thrust belt is represented by a terminal fan system.
  • Distributary channel patterns are characteristic of a terminal fan and reflect both loss of stream power and spatially/temporally fluctuating discharge events.
  • The base of the Candeleros Formation is represented by a flood basin environment that reflects a period of system expansion during which the distal floodplain was reworked by sheet-channelled flows.
  • The middle section of the formation is characterized by slow progradation of the system that led to the progressive installation of more proximal facies to the distal distributary system, which represented a period of high subsidence rate in the basin.
  • The Candeleros Formation ends with the development of a new system of proximal fans that caused a strong incisión of underlying fan deposits.

The authors wish to thank SeCyT (Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto) and CONICET, for providing financial support for the research project, and YPF SA. who provided support at various stages of the study. We thank to J.P. Le Roux (Universidad de Chile) and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive reviews, which led to further improvement of this manuscript.


Aguirre Urreta, B.; Tunik, M.; Naipauer, M.; Pazos, P.; Ottone, E.; Fanning, M.; Ramos, V. 2011. Malargüe Group (Maastrichtian-Danian) deposits in the Neuquén Andes, Argentina: Implications for the onset of the first Atlantic transgression related to Western Gondwana break-up. Gondwana Research 19 (2): 482-494.


Alexander, J.; Bridge, J.; Cheel, R.; Leclair, S. 2001. Bedforms and associated sedimentary structures formed under supercritical water flows over aggrading sand beds: Sedimentology 48 (1): 133-152.


Armas, P.; Sánchez, M.L. 2008. Horizontes sismogénicos (Grupo Neuquén) en depósitos estuáricos de la Formación Anacleto en el borde nororiental de Cuenca Neuquina, Cretácico Superior. In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 17, Actas 3: 1326-1327. Jujuy.


Asurmendi, E.; Sánchez, M.L. 2014a. Remanentes depositacionales del Grupo Neuquén (Cretácico Superior) en Cuenca Neuquina, Argentina: su importancia en   la caracterización del reservorio. Trabajos Técnicos (Cruz, C.E.; Fantin, F.; editors). In Congreso de Explo-ración y Desarrollo de Hidrocarburos, No. 9, Abstract expandido, Actas: DVD 161-168. Mendoza.


Asurmendi, E.; Sánchez, M.L. 2014b. Análisis petrográfico y procedencia de las sedimentitas de las Formaciones Candeleros y Huincul (Cretácico Inferior-Superior), región occidental de Cuenca Neuquina, provincia de Neuquén, Argentina. In Congreso de Exploración y Desarrollo de Hidrocarburos, No. 9, Abstract expandido, Actas: DVD 169-176. Mendoza.


Barrios, C. 1990. Paleogeographic control of Upper Cretaceous tidal deposits, Neuquén Basin, Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 3: 31-49.


Bridge, J.; Best, J. 1997. Preservation of planar laminae due to migration of low-relief bed waves over aggrading upper-stage plane beds: comparison of experimental data with theory. Sedimentology 44 (2): 253-262.


Bristow, C.; Skelly, R.; Ethridge, F. 1999. Crevasse splays from the rapidly aggrading, sand-bed, braided Niobrara River, Nebraska: effect of base-level rise. Sedimentology 46: 1029-1047.


Bush, A. 1997. Numerical simulation of the Cretaceous Tethys circumglobal current. Science 275: 807-810.


Cobbold, P.; Rossello, E. 2003. Aptian to recent compresional deformation, foothills of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. Marine and Petroleum Geology 20: 429-443.


Cuevas, M.; Martinius, W. 1993. Outcrop database for the geological characterization of fluvial reservoirs: an example from distal fluvial fan deposits in the Loranca Basin, Spain. In Characterization of fluvial and aeolian reservoirs (North, C.; Prosser, J.; editors). Geological Society Special Publication 73: 79-94.


Daniels, R.; Gamble, E.; Nelson, L. 1971. Relations between soil morphology and water-table levels on a dissected North Carolina coastal plain surface. Soil Science Society of America 35: 157-175.


Davies, D.; Williams, B.; Vessell, R. 1993. Dimensions and quality of reservoirs originating in low and high sinuosity channel systems, Lower Cretaceous Travis Peak Formation, East Texas, USA. In Characterization of Fluvial and Aeolian Reservoirs (North, C.; Prosser, D.; editors). Geological Society, Special Publication 73: 95-121.


De Ferrariis, C. 1968. El Cretácico del norte de la  Patagonia. In Jornadas Geológicas Argentinas, No. 3, Actas 1: 121-144. Buenos Aires.


Devaney, J. 1999. Clastic Sedimentology of the Beaufort Formation, Prince Patrick Island, Canadian Arctic Islands: Late Tertiary Sandy Braided River Deposits with Woody Detritus Beds. ARCTIC 44 (3): 206-216.


Esteban, M.; Kappla, C. 1983. Subareal exposure environment. In Carbonate depositional environments  (Scholle, P.; Bebout, D.; Moore, C.; editors). American Association of Petroleum Geologists 66: 1-54.


Fielding, C. 2006. Upper flow regime sheets, lenses and scour fill: Extending the range of architectural elements for fluvial sediment bodies. Sedimentary Geology 190: 227-240.


Garrido, A. 2000. Estudio estratigráfico, reconstrucción paleoambiental de las secuencias fosilífiras continentales del Cretácico Superior en las inmediaciones de Plaza Huincul, Provincia del Neuquén. Trabajo Final para el título de grado (Unpublished), Escuela de geología de la Facultad de Ciencias Exáctas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba: 78 p.


Gibling, M.R. 2006. Width and thickness of fluvial channel bodies and valley fills in the geological record: a literature compilation and classification. Journal of Sedimentary Research 76 (5): 731-770.


Hampton, B.; Horton, B. 2007. Sheetflow fluvial processes in a rapidly subsiding basin, Altiplano plateau, Bolivia. Sedimentology 54: 1121-1147.


Herrero Duclox, A. 1946. Contribución al conocimiento geológico del Neuquén extraandino. BIP No. 266.


Hornung, J.; Aigner, T. 2002. Reservoir architecture in a terminal alluvial plain: an outcrop analogue study (Upper Triassic, Southern Germany) Part II: cyclicity, controls and models. Journal of Petroleum Geology 25 (2): 151-178.


Horrell, M. 1991. Phytogeography and paleoclimatic interpretation of the Maestrichtian. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 86: 87-138.


Howell, J.; Schwarz, E.; Spalletti, L.; Veiga, G. 2005. The Neuquén Basin Argentina: An overview. In The Neuquén Basin, Argentina: A case study in sequence stratigraphy and basin dynamics (Veiga, G.; Spalletti, L.; Howell, J.; Schwarz, E.; editors). Geological Society, Special Publications 252: 1-14. London.


Hugo, C.; Leanza, H. 2001. Hoja Geológica 3969-IV, General Roca, provincias del Neuquén y Río Negro. Instituto de Geología y Recursos Naturales (SEGEMAR), Boletín 308: 1-71.


Jo, H. 2003. Depositional environments, architecture, and controls of Early Cretaceous non-marine successions in the northwestern part of Kyongsang Basin, Korea. Sedimentary Geology 161: 269-294.


Jo, H.; Chough, S. 2001. Architectural analysis of fluvial sequences in the northwestern part of Kyongsang Basin (Early Cretaceous), SE Korea. Sedimentary Geology 144: 307-334.


Jones, H.; Hajek, E. 2007. Characterizing avulsion stratigraphy in ancient alluvial deposits. Sedimentary Geology 202: 124-137.


Jorgensen, P.; Fielding, C.1996. Facies architecture of alluvial floodbasin deposits: three-dimensional data from the Upper Triassic Callide Coal Measures of east-central Queensland, Australia. Sedimentology 43: 479-495.


Kelly, S.; Olsen, H. 1993. Terminal Fans-a review with reference to Devonian examples. Sedimentary Geology 85: 339-374.


Khan, I.; Bridge, J.; Kappelman, J.; Wilson, R. 1997. Evolution of Miocene fluvial environments, eastern Potwar plateau, northern Pakistan. Sedimentology 44: 221-252.


Kraus, M. 1999. Paleosols in clastic sedimentary rocks: their geologic applications. Earth-Science Reviews 47: 41-70.


Kraus, M.; Wells, T. 1999. Recognizing avulsion deposits in the ancient stratigraphical record. Fluvial Sedimentology 6, Special Publication 28: 251-268.


Lang, S.; Payenberg, T.; Reilly, M.; Hicks, W.; Benson, J.; Kassan, J. 2004. Modern analogues for dryland sandy fluviallacustrine deltas and terminal splay reservoirs. APPEA Journal 329-356.


Leanza, H. 2009. Las principales discordancias del Mesozoico de la Cuenca Neuquina según observa-ciones de superficie. Revista Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 11 (2): 145-18.


Leanza, H.; Hugo, C. 1997. Hoja geológica 3969-III- Picún Leufú, Provincias del Neuquén y Río Negro. Institutos de Geología y Recursos Naturales, SEGEMAR, Boletín 218: 1-135. Buenos Aires.


Legarreta, L.; Gulisano, C. 1989. Análisis estratigráfico secuencial de la Cuenca Neuquina (Triásico superior-Terciario inferior). In Cuencas Sedimentarias Argentinas (Chebli, G.; Spalletti, L.; editors). Instituto Miguel Lillo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Serie Correlación Geológica 6: 221-244.


López-Gómez, J.; Arche, A.; Vargas, H.; Marzo, M. 2010. Fluvial architecture as a response to two-layer lithospheric subsidence during the Permian and Triassic in the Iberian Basin, Eastern Spain. Sedimentary Geology 223: 320-333.


MacCarthy, I. 1990. Alluvial sedimentation patterns in the unster Basin, Ireland. Sedimentology 37: 685-712.


Manacorda, L.; Cafferata, A.; Boggetti, D.; Pacheco, M.; Barrionuevo, L.; Reinante, M.; Meissingern, V. 2004. Modelo paleoambiental del Grupo Neuquén en la zona norte de la Cuenca Neuquina. In Reunión de Sedimentología, No. 10, Simposio Límite K/T de Argentina: 88-90. San Luis.


Marshall, J. 2000. Sedimentology of a Devonian faults-bounded braidplain and lacustrine fill in the lower part of the Skrinkle Sandstone, Dyfed, Wales. Sedimentology 47: 325-342.


Martinsen, O.; Ryseth, A.; Helland-Hansen, W.; Flesche, H.; Torkindsen, G.; Idil, S. 1999. Stratigraphic base level and fluvial architecture: Ericson Sandstone (Campanian), Rock Springs Uplift, SW Wyoming, USA. Sedimentology 46: 235-259.


Martinsen, R. 2003. Depositional remnants, part 1: Common components of thestratigraphic record with important implications for hydrocarbon exploration and production. AAPG Bulletin 87 (12): 1869-1882.


McCarthy, P.; Martini, I.; Lekie, D. 1997. Anatomy and evolution of a Lower Cretaceous alluvial plain: sedimentology and paleosols in the Upper Blairmore Group, south-western Alberta, Canada. Sedimento-logy 44: 197-220.


Miall, A. 1996. The geology of fluvial deposits. Sedimen-tary Facies, Basin Analysis and Petroleum Geology. Springer-Verlag: 575 p. Italia.


Miall, A.D. 1977. A Review of the braided river depositional enviroment. Earth Science Revision 13: 1-62.


Miall, A.D. 1978. Lithofacies types and vertical profile models in braided river deposits: a summary. In Fluvial Sedimentology. Memory Canadian Society Petroeum Geology 5: 597-604.


Miall, A.D. 1985. Architectural-element analysis: a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits. Earth Science Reviews 22: 261-308.


Mjøs, R.; Walderhaug, O.; Prestholm, E. 1993. Crevasse splay sandstone geometries in the Middle Jurassic Ravenscar Group of Yorkshire, UK. In Alluvial Sedimentation (Marzo, M.; Puigdefabregas, C.; editors). International Association of Sedimento-logists, Special Publication 17: 167-184.


Mosquera, A.; Ramos, V. 2005. Intraplate deformation in the Neuquén embayment. In Congreso de Exploración y Desarrollo de Hidrocarburos, No. 6, Actas en CD: 28 p. Mar del Plata.


Muller, R.; Nystuen, J.; Wright, V. 2004. Pedogenic mud aggregates and paleosol development in ancient dryland river systems: criteria for interpreting alluvial mudrock origin and floodplain dynamics. Journal of Sedimentary Research 74: 537-551.


Naipauer, M.; Morabito, E.; Marques, J.; Tunik, M.; Rojas Vera, E.; Vujovich, G.; Pimentel, M.; Ramos, V. 2012. Intraplate Late Jurassic deformation and exhumation in western central Argentina: Constraints from surface data and U-Pb detrital zircon ages. Tectonophysics 524: 59-74.


Newell, A.; Tverdokhlebov, V.; Benton, M. 1999. Interplay of tectonics and climate on a transverse fluvial system, Upper Permian, Southern Uralian Foreland Basin, Russia. Sedimentary Geology 127: 11-29.


Nichols, G.; Fisher, J. 2007. Processes, facies and architecture of fluvial distributary system deposits. Sedimentary Geology 195: 75-90.


Pángaro, F.; Bruveris, P. 1999. Reactivación tectónica multiepisódica de sistemas extensionales, Cuenca Neuquina, Argentina. In Congreso Geológico Argen-tino No. 14: 231-234. Salta.


Pángaro, F.; Pereira, D.; Micucci, E. 2009. El sinrift de la Dorsal de Huincul, Cuenca Neuquina: evolución y control sobre la estratigrafía y estructura del área. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 65 (2): 265-277.


Paola, C.; Wiele, S.; Reinhart, M. 1989. Upper-regime parallel lamination us the result of turbulent sediment transport and low-amplitude bed forms. Sedimentology 36: 47-59.


Parkash, B.; Awasthi, A.; Gohain, K. 1983. Lithofacies of the Markanda terminal fan, Kurukshetra district, Haryana, India. In Modern and Ancient Fluvial Systems (Collinson, J.D.; Lewin, J.; editors). International Association of Sedimentologists, Special Publication 6: 337-344.


Rajchl, M.; Uličný, D. 2005. Depositional record of an avulsive fluvial system controlled by peat compaction (Neogene, Most Basin, Czech Republic). Sedimento-logy 52: 601-625.


Ramos V.A.; Pimentel, M.; Tunik, M. 2008. Late Cretaceous synorogenic deposits of the Neuquén Basin (36-39°S): Age constraints from U-Pb dating in detrital zircons. In International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics, No. 7 (ISAG), Extended abstracts: 423-426. Nice.


Ramos, V. 1981. Descripción geológica de la Hoja 33c, Los Chihuidos Norte. Boletín Servicio Geológico Nacional 182: 103 p. Buenos Aires.


Ramos, V. 1999. Rasgos estructurales del territorio argentine, evolución tectónica de Argentina. Geología Argentina, Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales, Anales 29 (24): 715-784. Buenos Aires.


Ramos, V.; Folguera, A. 2005. Tectonic evolution of the Andes of Neuquén: constrains derived from the magmatic arc and foreland deformation. In The Neuquén Basin, Argentina: A case study in sequence stratigraphy and basin dynamics (Veiga, G.; Spalletti, L.; Howell, J.; Schwarz, E.; editors). Geological Society, Special Publications 252:15-35. London.


Retallack, G. 1990. Soils of the past: an introduction to paleopedology. Harper Collins Academic: 520 p. Hammersmith.


Retallack, G. 1994. A pedotype approach to latest Cretaceous and earliest Tertiary paleosols in eastern Montana. Geological Society of America Bulletin106: 1377-1397.


Retallack, G. 2001. Soils of the past: an introduction to paleopedology, second edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 404 p. UK.


Rodríguez, M.; Leanza, H.; Salvarredy Aranguren, M. 2007. Hoja Geológica 3969-II provincias del Neuquén, Río Negro y La Pampa. Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales, Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, Boletín 370: 165 p. Buenos Aires.


Rust, B.; Jones, B. 1987. The Hawkesbury Sandstone south of Sydney, Australia. Triassic analogue for the deposits of large braided rivers. Journal Sedimentary. Petrology 57: 222-233.


Rygel, M.; Gibling, M. 2006. Natural geomorphic variability recorded in a high-accommodation setting: fluvial architecture of the Pennsylvanian Joggins Formation of Atlantic Canada. Journal of Sedimentary Research 76: 1230-1251.


Sadler, S.; Kelly, S. 1993. Fluvial processes and cyclicity in the terminal fan deposits: an example from the Late Devonian of southwest Ireland. In Current Research in Fluvial Sedimentology (Fielding, C.R.; editor). Sedimentary Geology 85: 374-386.


Sánchez, M.; Armas, P. 2008. Paleoambientes sedimentarios del Cretácico Superior en el borde Nororiental de Cuenca Neuquina, Formación Anacleto y Miembro inferior de la Formación Allen (Schiuma, M.; editor). In Congreso de Exploración y Desarrollo de Hidrocarburos, No. 7: 543-564.


Sánchez, M.; Asurmendi, E. 2011. Distribución y evolución del Subgrupo Río Limay (Cretácico Superior) en el sector central de Cuenca Neuquina, provincias de Neuquén, Mendoza y Río Negro. In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 18: 1 p. (CD Room). Neuquén.


Sánchez, M.; Heredia, S.; Calvo, J. 2004. Paleoambientes sedimentarios de la Formación Candeleros (Subgrupo Río Limay), Cretácico Tardío, en el Cañadón El Escondido, sudeste del Neuquén. In Reunión de Sedimentología-Simposio Límite K/T de Argentina No. 10: 158-159. San Luis.


Sánchez, M.; Gómez, J.; Heredia, S. 2006. Sedimentología y paleoambientes sedimentarios de los tramos medio y superior del Subgrupo Río Colorado (Cretácico superior), Grupo Neuquén, en las bardas de la ciudad de Neuquén y alrededores, Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 61 (2): 236-255.


Sánchez, M.; Rossi, J.; Morra, S.; Armas, P. 2008. Análisis estratigráfico secuencial de las Formaciones Huincul y Lisandro del Subgrupo Río Limay (Grupo Neuquén- Cretácico Superior) en el departamento El Cuy, Río Negro, Argentina. Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis 15 (1): 1-26.


Sánchez, M.; Armas, P.; Morra, S.; Asurmendi, E.; Rossi, J. 2009. Estructuras Deformacionales de Meso y Macro Escala ¿Sindepositacionales o Indicadores de Actividad Sísmica?, Grupo Neuquén (Cretácico Superior), Pcias. de Río Negro y Neuquén, Argentina. In Reunión de Tectónica No. 14 y Taller de Campo de Tectónica, No. 3, Tomo I: 43 p. Río Cuarto, Córdoba.


Silvestro, J.; Zubiri, M. 2008. Convergencia oblicua: modelo estructural alternativo para la Dorsal Neuquina (39ºS) Neuquén. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 63 (1): 49-64.


Spalletti, L.; Gazzera, C.E. 1994. Eventos eólicos en capas rojas cretácicas (Formación Río Limay, Grupo Neuquén), sector sudeste de la Cuenca Neuquina, Argentina. In Contribuciones de los Simposios sobre Cretácico de América Latina (Spalletti, L.; editor). Parte A: Eventos y Registro Sedimentario, Actas: 89-100.


Stam, M. 2002. Effects of land-use and precipitation changes on floodplain sedimentation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Geul River, The Netherlands). In Flood and Megaflood Processes and Deposits: Recent and Ancient Examples (Martini, I.; Baker, V.; Garzon, G.; editors). Special Publications International Association Sedimentologists 32: 251-267.


Tanner, L.; Spencer, L. 2007. The Moenave Formation: Sedimentologic and stratigraphic context of the Triassic-Jurassic boundary in the Four Corners area, southwestern U.S.A. Palaeogeography, Palaeocli-matology, Palaeoecology 244: 111-125.


Therrien, F. 2005. Palaeoenvironments of the latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) dinosaurs of Romania: insights from fluvial deposits and paleosols of the Transylvanian and Haţeg basins. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 218: 15-56.


Tooth, S. 1999. Floodouts in central Australia. In Varieties of Fluvial Form (Miller, A.; Gupta, A.; editors). Wiley, Chichester: 219-247.


Tunbridge, I. 1981. Sand high-energy flood sedimentation-some criteria of recognition, with an example from the Devonian of S.W. England. Sedimentary Geology 28: 79-95.


Tunik, M.; Folguera, M.; Naipauer, M.; Pimentel, M.; Ramos, V. 2010. Early uplift and orogenic deformation in the Neuquén Basin: Constraints on the Andean uplift from U-Pb and Hf isotopic data of detrital zircons. Tectonophysics 489: 258-273.


Uliana, M.; Dellapé, D. 1981. Estratigrafía y evolución paleoambiental de la sucesión Maastrichtiana-eoterciaria del engolfamiento Neuquino (Patagonia Septentrional). In Congreso Geológico Argentino, No. 8, Actas 3: 673-711. San Luis.


Veiga, G.; Howell, J.; Strömback, A. 2005. Anatomy of a mixed marine-non-marine lowstand wedge in a ramp setting, The record of Barremian-Aptian complex relative sea-level fall in central Neuquén Basin, Argentina. The Geological Society, Special Publication: 139-162.


Vergani, G.; Tankard, A.; Belotti, H.; Welsink, H.1995. Tectonic evolution and paleogeography of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. In Petroleum Basins of South America (Tankard, A.; Suárez, R.; Welsink, H.; editors). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 62: 383-402.


Voigt, S.; Hay, W.; Höfling, R.; DeConto, R. 1999. Biogeographic distribution of late Early to Late Cretaceous rudist-reefs in the Mediterranean as climate indicators. In Evolution of the Cretaceous Ocean-Climate System (Barrera, E.; Johnson, C.; editors).Geological Society of America Special Paper 332: 91-103.


Wakelin-King, G.; Webb, J. 2007. Upper-flow-regime mud floodplains, lower-flow-regime sand channels: sediment transport and deposition in a drylands mud-aggregate river. Journal of Sedimentary Research 77: 702-712.


Wichmann, R. 1927. Sobre la facies lacustre senoniana de los Estratos con Dinosaurios y su fauna. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias 30: 383-405. Córdoba.


Wolela, A. 2009. Sedimentation and depositional environments of the Barremian-Cenomanian Debre Libanose Sandstone, Blue Nile (Abay) Basin, Ethiopia. Cretaceous Research 30: 1133-1145.


Zaleha, M. 1997. Intra- and extrabasinal controls on fluvial deposition in the Miocene Indo-Gangetic foreland basin, northern Pakistan. Sedimentology 44: 369-390.


Zamora Valcarce, G.; Rapalini, A.; Spagnuolo, C. 2007. Reactivación de estructuras cretácicas durante la deformación miocena, Faja plegada del Agrio, Neu-quén. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 62 (2):299-307.


Zamora Valcarce, G.; Zapatata, T.; Ramos, V.; Rodríguez, F.; Bernardo, L. 2009. Evolución tectónica del frente andino en Neuquén. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 65 (1): 192-203.


Zapata, T.; Folguera, A. 2005. Tectonic evolution of the Andean fold and thrust belt of the southern Neuquén Basin, Argentina. In The Neuquén Basin, Argentina: A case study in sequence stratigraphy and basin dynamics (Veiga, G.; Spalletti, L.; Howell, J.; Schwarz, E.; editors). Geological Society, Special Publications 252: 37-56. London.