Revista geológica de Chile - Late Cretaceous Belonostomus (Pisces, Actinopterygii, Aspidorhynchidae) from Algarrobo, Chile, with comments on aspidorhynchid paleodistribution in South America

Revista Geológica de Chile, Vol. 30, No. 1, p. 117-127, 2 Figs., 1 plate, July 2003.

 

Late Cretaceous Belonostomus (Pisces, Actinopterygii,
Aspidorhynchidae) from Algarrobo, Chile, with comments on
aspidorhynchid paleodistribution in South America

Paulo M. Brito

Departamento de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro,Rua
São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559-900, Brazil
pmbrito@uerj.br

   
Mario E. Suárez

Sección Paleontología,Museo Nacional de Historia Natural,
Casilla 787, Santiago, Chile.
msuarez@mnhn.cl

ABSTRACT

Aspidorhynchid remains are described from the Upper Cretaceous Quiriquina Formation of Chile. Although only fragments have been recovered, their characteristics allow to identify them as Belonostomus longirostris Lambe. This is the first record of this genus confirmed in Chile. B. longirostris Lambe had a South American/Pacific marginal pattern of distribution, showing more affinities with the North American fauna than to the South American Atlantic one.

Key words: Pisces, Aspidorhynchidae, Quiriquina Formation, Upper Cretaceous, Chile.

RESUMEN

Belonostomus (Pisces, Actinopterygii, Aspidorhynchidae) del Cretácico Superior de Algarrobo, Chile, con comentarios sobre la paleodistribución de los aspidorhínchidos en América del Sur. Se describen los restos de un aspidorhínchido recolectado en estratos de la Formación Quiriquina, Cretácico Superior. Las características de tales restos son suficientes para permitir su identificación como Belonostomus longirostris Lambe. Este es el primer registro confirmado de este género en Chile. B. longirostris Lambe tuvo un modelo de distribución marginal en el Pacífico de América del Sur mostrando más afinidad con la fauna de América del Norte que con la fauna atlántica de América del Sur.

Palabras claves: Peces, Aspidorhynchidae, Formación Quiriquina, Cretácico Superior, Chile.

INTRODUCTION

The Aspidorhynchidae comprises a monophyletic assemblage of Mesozoic actinopterygians, including three genera: Aspidorhynchus, Belonos tomus and Vinctifer. Aspidorhynchids have a world-wide distribution and confirmed range from the Mid Jurassic to the Late Cretaceous (Brito, 1988, 1997, 1999; Maisey, 1991), although there are mentions of the family in the early Paleocene (Bryant, 1987, 1989).

Characteristic features of these fishes are the presence of an elongate 'rostrum' composed of the premaxillae, a supplementary bone in the lower jaw, the predentary, deep elongate flank scales, and the extreme posterior position of the dorsal and anal fins.

Currently, the Aspidorhynchidae are considered as primitive teleosts (Patterson, 1973, 1977; Pinna, 1996; Brito, 1997, 1999; Brito and Meunier, 2000) although Arratia (1999, 2000, 2001) had questioned the taxonomic position of this clade, considering them as stem-group teleosts.

In South America, aspidorhynchids are widely distributed throughout the Cretaceous (Agassiz, 1841; Jordan, 1919; Casamiquela, 1992; Santos, 1990; Moody and Maisey, 1994; Schultze and Stöhr, 1996; Brito, 1997; Arratia and Schultze, 1999), and have a single Jurassic record in Argentina (Leanza and Zeiss, 1990).

In the present study, some remains of an aspidorhynchid are described. They were collected by one of the authors (MES) from Algarrobo, south of Valparaíso, Chile (33°31'S-71°39'W, text-Fig. 1), the northernmost outcrop of the Upper Cretaceous Quiriquina Formation of Chile (Stinnesbeck, 1986). Although only fragments have been recovered, sufficient remains allow the authors to identify them as a species of Belonostomus (for a list of material examined for comparison, see Brito, 1997). The studied material is deposited in the collection of the Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Chile (SGO-PV).

The Algarrobo locality was discovered in 1866 by Landbeck, who made the first collection of fossil material from this site for the Museo Nacional de Historia Natural of Chile in Santiago. The fossils from this locality represent a typical Late Cretaceous marine assemblage with numerous invertebrates (Tavera, 1980) and vertebrates, including chondrichthyan (e.g., squatinids, orectolobiformes, odontaspidids, sclerorhynchids, palaeospinacids and holocephalian; Suárez and Lamilla, 1998; Suárez, 2000a, 2001) and vertebrates (osteichthyans and plesiosaurs; Philippi, 1887; Brüggen, 1915; Suárez, 2000b).

The marine strata of the Quiriquina Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of central-south Chile have been known since the 19th century (e.g., Philippi, 1887; Steinmann, 1896; O. Galli1), but were only informally named and described recently (Biró-Bagóczky, 1982). The designated type locality is at Las Tablas on the north-west Bay of Quiriquina Island. A Campanian-Maastrichtian age was proposed for the Quiriquina Formation by Biró-Bagóczky (1982), but Stinnesbeck (1986) regarded it as exclusively Maastrichtian.

Fossiliferous horizons of this formation crop out in several places along the central-south coast of Chile and reach their maximum development on Quiriquina Island and at Concepción Bay (text-Fig. 1). Fossiliferous localities are also known in the north of this area but they are largely unstudied.

Two distinct sedimentary units are exposed at Algarrobo. The lower unit is referred to the Quiriquina Formation, while the upper one is regarded as a separate formation and is of Eocene age (see Tavera, 1980). The Upper Cretaceous sequence comprises a series of fine sandstone and conglomerates of pebbles, cobbles and boulders which rest unconformably on granitic rocks.

The age of the conglomerate has been the subject of discussion by several authors. They were first considered to be Senonian by Brüggen (1915) and later as Maastrichtian by Klohn (1956) and Muñoz-Cristi (1960). Ruiz et al. (1960) considered them to be Upper Campanian by the presence of the ammonite Grossouvreites in the conglomerate. Unpublished data using Sr isotopes from well preserved bivalve shells by Pekar and Suárez (in prep.) support Maastrichtian age for the upper part of the sequence first proposed by Klohn (1956).

Text FIG. 1. Late Cretaceous localities showing fish remains in Chile.

SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTIONS

Division Halecostomi Regan, 1923
Family Aspidorhynchidae Nicholson and Lydekker, 1889
Genus Belonostomus Agassiz, 1834

Belonostomus longirostris Lambe, 1902
Pl. 1, Figs. A-C

Material: two 'rostrum' fragments (e.g., premaxillae) and a predentary. The specimens are housed at the Sección de Paleontología, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile: (SGO-PV 788; SGO PV 789; SGO PV 790; Pl. 1, Figs. A-C).

Description: the rostrum is mainly formed by the premaxillae (SGO-PV 788 and SGO PV 790). Both premaxillae are elongated tube-like bones, fused medially (Pl. 1, Fig. A). In cross-section, the premaxillae have an inversed V-shaped, presenting a canal in each of the bones (Pl. 1, Fig. B). Although teeth are missing or broken in both specimens, each premaxilla presents a single lateral row of closely spaced teeth located on the ventro-lateral surface of the bone. The 'rostrum' is covered with a layer of ganoine. The lateral surfaces of the premaxillae are smooth, the dorsal surface presenting grooves and ridges of ganoine. On the anterior tip of the premaxillae, the ganoine surface is concentrated into sub-parallel longitudinal ridges in both, dorsal and ventral, parts of the 'rostrum'.

The predentary SGO-PV-789 is elongate, and is relatively deeper and narrower than the premaxillae. It is oval with a single central canal in cross-section.

The predentary bears a single median row of larger teeth flanked by lateral rows of tiny closely spaced teeth (Pl. 1, Fig. C). This bone is covered with a shiny ganoine layer. Laterally, this bone is smooth, presenting sub-parallel longitudinal ridges in its ventral part.

TAXONOMICAL DISCUSSION

The Quiriquina specimens have two synapomorphies of the Aspidorhynchidae: presence of a long toothed 'rostrum' formed by the premaxillae and the lower jaw supplementary bone, the predentary.

The presence of a toothed premaxillae is a character found only in Aspidorhynchus and Belonostomus. In Vinctifer, the premaxillae are edentulous (Brito, 1988, 1997).

Only the genera Belonostomus and Vinctifer have ganoine on skull bones. Aspidorhynchus lacks ganoine on the skull bones (Schultze, 1966; Brito and Meunier, 2000).

An indeterminate Aspidorhynchidae had been recently reported from the Upper Cretaceous Lomas Negras locality of Chile (Arratia and Schultze, 1999). However, this taxon seems morphologically different from the Quiriquina Formation specimens, specially because of its toothless predentary.

The specimens studied here are assigned to Belonostomus due to the presence of an elongate predentary, somewhat equivalent to the 'rostrum' in other fish clades. In the other two genera, Aspidorhynchus and Vinctifer, the predentary is triangular, and is always shorter than the premaxillae.

In cross-section the studied specimens show an inverted V shaped premaxillae. This configuration, plus the distribution of the closely spaced teeth in a single row in the ventro-lateral surface of these bones, as well as the oval shape of the predentary in cross-section, are diagnostic for Belonostomus longirostris Lambe, a typical taxon from the Upper Cretaceous of North America (see Brito, 1997).

B. longirostris has also been recorded from South America in the Coli Toro Formation (Late Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of Argentina (Casamiquela, 1992). A comparison between the description and the figures presented by Casamiquela (1992) with the new material from the Quiriquina Formation and the North American material (e.g., shape of the premaxillae and predentary in cross-section, distribution of teeth in the premaxillae, ganoin ornamentation) confirms this taxonomic status.

BIOGEOGRAPHICAL IMPLICATIONS

In terms of presence/absence data in the known fossil record, the historical biogeography of the aspidorhynchids can be summarised as follows (see Brito, 1997 for references): Aspidorhynchus is known from the Mid Jurassic/Upper Jurassic of Europe and Cuba. Vinctifer is known from the Upper Jurassic of Antarctica although this material, described as an Aspidorhynchus by Richter and Thomson (1989), could be reworked from Lower Cretaceous rocks. It is also known from the Lower Cretaceous of Australia, Africa, Mexico and South America (e.g., Venezuela, Colombia and Brazil). Belonostomus is present in the Upper Jurassic of Europe and Argentina, Lower Cretaceous of Europe and Mexico and Upper Cretaceous of Morocco, Lebanon, Israel, Europe, North America, and South America (e.g., Venezuela, Chile, and Argentina). Finally, an Aspidorhynchidae indet., morphologically different from the three known taxa, had been reported from the Upper Cretaceous of Chile (Arratia and Schultze, 1999).

The distribution of aspidorhynchids in South America suggests the following: Vinctifer was endemic to the southern and western Tethys, being a typical early Cretaceous (Aptian-Albian) clade, found in shallow marginal platform settings along the north-western margin of South America, which is today Venezuela and Colombia (Moody and Maisey, 1994; Schultze and Stöhr, 1996; Brito, 1997; Maisey, 2000) as well as in a widespread epicontinental sea that probably extended south from the Caribbean Tethys onto the South American continent and is represented today by several Brazilian basins (e.g., Parnaíba, Araripe, Tucano, Sergipe-Alagoas basins) (Brito, 1997; Maisey, 2000).

Until now, Belonostomus was known in South America only from the Upper Jurassic Neuquén Basin, Argentina (Leanza and Zeiss, 1990), from the Cenomanian- Santonian La Luna Formation, Venezuella (Moody and Maisey, 1994), and from the Upper Cretaceous Coli Toro Formation, Argentina (Casamiquela, 1992). Occurrences of Belonostomus in the Upper Jurassic of Argentina can be interpreted as a separate migration of the genus through the Hispanic corridor (Hallam, 1977, 1983). The identification of the Quiriquina aspidorhynchid as Belonostomus longirostris Lambe, as well as the confirmation of the presence of this species in the Upper Cretaceous of Argentina, and the presence of Belonostomus in Venezuela is further evidence for a Late Cretaceous connection along the Pacific marginal platform, between North America and South America (text. Fig. 2). This Pacific seaway pattern of distribution is also found in several other taxa such as batoids, holocephalians, and actinopterygians (Suárez, 2001, and unpublished data).

Text FIG. 2. Paleogeographic distribution of Belonostomus longirostris Lambe during the Upper Cretaceous (marked with an asterisk). Continental margins modified after Siverson (1996). Localities: 1- Alberta; 2- Wyoming; 3- Texas; 4- Venezuela; 5- Chile; 6- Argentina. Square= Belonostomus sp.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken as a whole, the authors can conclude that:

• The anatomical description, of a 'rostrum' formed by the premaxillae and a supplementary bone from the lower jaw, the predentary, clearly support the assignment of the specimens in the family Aspidorhynchidae.

• The presence of toothed premaxillae covered by ganoine and an elongate predentary indicates a placement of this taxon into the genus Belonostomus.

• This is the first confirmed record of a Belonostomus in Chile. This taxon is morphologically different from the Aspidorhynchidae indet., recently reported from the Upper Cretaceous Lomas Negras locality by Arratia and Schultze (1999).

• In cross-section, the Quiriquina Belonostomus presents an inverted V shaped premaxillae and an oval predentary. These patterns, plus the distribution of closely spaced teeth in a single row in the premaxillae, are diagnostic for Belonostomus longirostris Lambe, a typical Late Cretaceous North American taxon, also known in Argentina.

• The morphological pattern described above allowed the authors to identify the studied material as a Belonostomus longirostris Lambe. However, due to the lack of synapomorphies this species is, in fact, a metaspecies sensu Donoghue (1985).

• During the Late Cretaceous, B. longirostris presented a Pacific seaway pattern of distribution. This pattern is also found in many other fish taxa (Suárez, 2001, and unpublished data).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank G. Arratia, H.-P. Schultze, and J. Kriwet (Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin) for the suggestions and critiques of this work, D. Martill (University of Portsmouth) for the stylistic revision of the English manuscript. D. Frassinetti Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile), E. Pérez d'A., and A. Rubilar (Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Chile) for their help with valuable and pertinent information.

The main author's research was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). The co-author's research was partially supported by the Sociedad Paleontológica de Chile (SPACH).

1 1967. Geología urbana y suelo de fundación de Concepción y Talcahuano, Chile (Inédito), Universidad de Concepción, Instituto Central de Química, Departamento de Geología y Mineralogía, p. 1-248.

REFERENCES

Agassiz, L. 1833-1844. Recherches sur les Poissons fossiles. Neuchâtel, 5 Vols. p. 1-1420.         [ Links ]

Agassiz, L. 1841. On the fossil fishes found by Mr. Gardner in the Province of Ceará, in the North of Brazil. Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, Vol. 30, p. 82- 84.         [ Links ]

Arratia, G. 1999. The monophyly of Teleostei and stem-group teleosts. In Mesozoic Fishes 2: Systematics and Fossil Record (Arratia, G.; Schultze, H. P.; editors). Verlag Dr. F. Pfiel, p. 264- 334. München.         [ Links ]

Arratia, G. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of Teleostei. Past and present. Estudios Oceanológicos, Vol. 19, p. 19- 51.         [ Links ]

Arratia, G. 2001. The Sister-Group of Teleostei: Consensus and Disagreements. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Vol. 21, No. 4, p. 767- 773.         [ Links ]

Arratia, G.; Schultze, H.P. 1999. Mesozoic fishes from Chile. In Mesozoic Fishes 2: Systematics and Fossil Record (Arratia, G.; Schultze, H.P.; editors). Verlag Dr. F. Pfiel, p. 565- 593. München.         [ Links ]

Biró-Bagóczky, L. 1982. Revisión y redefinición de los 'Estratos de Quiriquina' Campaniano-Maastrichtiano, en su localidad tipo, en la Isla Quiriquina, 36°37' Lat. Sur, Chile, Sudamérica, con un perfil complementario en Cocholgue. In Congreso Chileno de Geología, No. 3, Actas, Vol. 1, p. 29- 64. Concepción.         [ Links ]

Brito, P. M. 1988. La structure du suspensorium de Vinctifer, Poisson Actinoptérygien Mésozoïque: remarques sur les implications phylogénétiques. Geobios, Vol. 21, No. 6, p. 819-823.         [ Links ]

Brito, P. M. 1997. Révision des Aspidorhynchidae (Pisces-Actinopterygii) du Mésozoïque: ostéologie et relations phylogénétiques. Geodiversitas, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 681- 772.         [ Links ]

Brito, P.M. 1999. The caudal skeleton complex of aspidorhynchids (Actinopterygii, Halecostomi): phylogenetic implications. In Mesozoic Fishes 2: Systematics and Fossil Record (Arratia, G.; Schultze, H.P.; editors). Verlag Dr. F. Pfiel, p. 249- 264. München.         [ Links ]

Brito, P. M.; Meunier F.J. 2000. The morphology and histology of the scales of Aspidorhynchids (Actinopteryii, Halecostomi) and its phyloenetical implications. Geobios, Vol. 33, No. 1, p. 105-111.         [ Links ]

Brüggen, J. 1915. El Cretáceo del Algarrobo i las supuestas relaciones entre las formaciones cretácea i terciaria de Chile. Sociedad Imprenta-Litografía Barcelona. Santiago-Valparaíso, 15 p.         [ Links ]

Bryant, L.J. 1987. Belonostomus (Teleostei: Aspidorhynchidae) from the Late Paleocene of North Dakota. Paleobios, Vol. 43, p. 1-3.         [ Links ]

Bryant, L.J. 1989. Non-dinosaurian lower vertebrates across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in northeastern Montana. University of California Publications, Vol. 134, p. 1-107.         [ Links ]

Casamiquela, R M. 1992. Notas sobre vertebrados de la frontera Cretácica-Terciaria II. La presencia del Aspidorrinquido 'Belonostomus' (Osteichthys, Aspidorhynchiformes) en la Formation Coli Toro (Maastrichtense), Ingeniero Jacobacci, Río Negro. Mundo Ameghiniano, Vol. 11, p. 9- 18.         [ Links ]

Donoghue, M.J. 1985. A critique of the biological species concept and recomendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Biologist, Vol. 88, p.172-181.         [ Links ]

Hallam, A. 1983. Early and mid-Jurassic molluscan biogeography and the establishment of the Central Atlantic seaway. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Vol. 43, p. 181- 193.         [ Links ]

Hallam, A. 1997. Biogeographic evidence bearing on the creation of Atlantic seaway in the Jurassic. In Paleontology and Plate Tectonics (West, R.; editor). Milwaukee Public Museum, Special Publication in Biology and Geology, Vol. 2, p. 23-34.         [ Links ]

Jordan, D.S. 1919. New genera of fossil fishes from Brazil. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Vol. 71, p. 208- 210.         [ Links ]

Klohn, C. 1956. Estado actual del estudio geológico de la formación porfírica. Revista Minerales, Vol. 8, p. 20- 33. Santiago, Chile.         [ Links ]

Lambe, L.M. 1902. New genera and species from the Belly River series (Mid-Cretaceous). In Contributions to Canadian Paleontology (Osborn, H.F.; Lambe L.M.; editors). Geological Survey of Canada, Vol. 3, Part. 2, p. 25-81. Ottawa.         [ Links ]

Leanza, H.A.; Zeiss, A. 1990. Upper Jurassic lithographic limestones from Argentina (Neuquén Basin): stratigraphy and fossils. Facies, Vol. 22, p. 169-186.         [ Links ]

Maisey, J.G. 1991. Vinctifer. In Santana Fossils, an Illustrated Atlas (Maisey, J. G.; editor). T.F.H. Publications, p. 170-189. Neptune City.         [ Links ]

Maisey, J.G. 2000. Continental break up and the distribution of fishes of Western Gondwana during the Early Cretaceous. Cretaceous Research, Vol. 21, p. 281- 314.         [ Links ]

Moody, M.J.; Maisey, J.G. 1994. New Cretaceous marine vertebrates assemblages from north-western Venezuela and their significance. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Vol. 14, No. 4, p. 1- 8.         [ Links ]

Muñoz-Cristi, J. 1960. Contribución al conocimiento geológico de la Cordillera de la Costa de la zona central. Revista Minerales, Vol. 69, p. 28- 47. Santiago, Chile.         [ Links ]

Nicholson, H.A.; Lydekker, R. 1889. A manual of palaeontology. 2nd. edition. Edinburgh and London, p. 1-1624.         [ Links ]

Patterson, C. 1973. Interrelationships of holosteans. In Interelationships of fishes (Greenwood, P.H.; Miles, R.S.; Patterson, C.; editors). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 53, Supplement 1, p. 233-305. London.         [ Links ]

Patterson, C. 1977. The contribution of paleontology to teleostean phylogeny. In Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution (Hecht, M.K.; Goody, P.C.; Hecht, B.M.; editors). NATO Advanced Study Institute Series, Ser. A, p. 579- 643. New York.         [ Links ]

Philippi, R.A. 1887. Los fósiles Terciarios i Cuartarios de Chile. Imprenta de F.A. Brockhaus, 256 p. Leipzig.         [ Links ]

Pinna, M.C.C. 1996. Teleostean monophyly. In Interrelationships of Fishes (Stiassny, M.L.J.; Parenti, L.R.; Johnson, G.D.; editors). Academic Press, p. 147- 162. San Diego.         [ Links ]

Regan, C.T. 1923. The skeleton of Lepisosteus, with remarks on the origin and evolution of the lower Neopterygian fishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, Vol. 1923, p. 445- 461.         [ Links ]

Richter, M.; Thomson, M.R.A. 1989. First Aspidorhynchidae (Pisces; Teleostei) from Antarctica. Antarctic Science, Vol. 1, p. 57-64.         [ Links ]

Ruiz, C.; Segerstrom, K.; Aguirre, L.; Corvalán, J.; Rose, H.; Stern, T. 1960. Edades plomo-alfa y marco estratigráfico de granitos chilenos. Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas, Boletín, No. 7, p. 1-26.         [ Links ]

Santos, R. da S. 1990. Vinctifer longirostris, do Cretáceo inferior da formação Marizal, Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Vol. 62, No. 3, p. 251-260.         [ Links ]

Schultze, H. P. 1966. Morphologische und histologische untersuchungen an Schuppen Mesozoischer Actinopterygier (Ubergang von Ganoid-zu undschuppen). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, Vol. 126, p. 232-314.         [ Links ]

Schultze, H.P.; Stöhr, D. 1996. Vinctifer (Pisces, Aspidorhynchidae) aus der Unterkreide (oberes Aptium) von Kolumbien. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, Vol. 199, p. 395- 415.         [ Links ]

Siverson, M. 1996. Lamniform sharks of the Mid Cretaceous Alinga Formation and Beedagong Claystone, Western Australia. Palaeontology, Vol. 39, No. 4, p. 813- 849.         [ Links ]

Steinmann, G. 1896. Das Auftreten und Alter der Quiriquina-Schichten. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Beilage-Band, Vol. 10, p. 1- 31.         [ Links ]

Stinnesbeck, W. 1986. Faunistic and palecological conditions of the Quiriquina Formation (Maastrichtian) of central Chile. Palaeontographica A, Vol. 194, p. 99-237.         [ Links ]

Suárez, M.E. 2000a. Ischyrhiza chilensis Philippi (Rajiformes: Sclerorhinchidae) del Cretácico Superior de la Formación Quiriquina. In Reunión Nacional de Ictiología, No. 5, 1992 (Resúmenes ), p. 22. Santiago.         [ Links ]

Suárez, M.E. 2000 b. Vertebrados fósiles de la Formación Quiriquina (Cretácico Superior) de Chile. Ameghiniana, Suplemento (Resúmenes), Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 33-34R.         [ Links ]

Suárez, M.E. 2001. Fossil fish faunas from the Quiriquina Formation, Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of Chile, South America. In International Meeting on Mesozoic Fishes, Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity, No. 3, Abstract Book, p. 59.         [ Links ]

Suárez, M.E.; Lamilla, J. 1998. Nuevos hallazgos de vertebrados marinos en el Cretácico Superior de Algarrobo. In Jornadas Argentinas de Paleontología de Vertebrados, No. 14, Actas (Resúmenes), p. 35.         [ Links ]

Tavera, J. 1980. Cretáceo y Terciario de la localidad de Algarrobo. Imprentas Gráficas, 45 p. Conchalí, Santiago.         [ Links ]

Manuscript received; January 8, 2002; accepted; May 29, 2003.

 

PLATE 1

Figs. A-C Belonostomus longirostris Lambe p. 119

Algarrobo, south of Valparaíso (33°31'S-31°39'W), Chile.

A. Fused premaxillae of specimen STGO-PV 788, in dorsal view.

B. Cross section in the middle part of the fused premaxillae, specimen STGO-PV 788.

C. Predentary of specimen STGO-PV 789, in dorsal view. Scales = 5 mm.

plate 1

© 2011 Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería